Section 3: Timber Culture Act

The Great Plains seemed a strange place to many newcomers. The land had no forests. Many Americans who decided to take advantage of the Homestead Act went to the Great Plains from states with great forests. They had experience in building houses from trees. Trees also provided firewood, wood for furniture, and shelter from the sun and wind.

The lack of trees was evidence that less rain fell on the Plains than it did in some places like Ohio or Pennsylvania. Some politicians and scientists believed that trees helped to create rainfall. They stated that the solution to the problems of lack of rainfall and lack of lumber for building and fuel was to plant trees.

Senator Phineas W. Hitchcock of Nebraska sponsored the Timber Culture Act, which Congress passed in 1873. This bill allowed settlers to claim an additional 160 acres if they would plant trees on 40 acres of that quarter section. The farmer had eight years to get all the trees planted. The trees had to survive for 13 years. After that time, if the trees were still alive, the farmer would get title to the land.

Farmers found the requirements of this law nearly impossible to meet. If rain did not fall in the year the trees were planted, they died. On the Great Plains, with its semi-arid climate, no one could count on enough rain to raise trees. The law required that claimants plant 2,700 trees per acre. Of those trees, 675 trees per acre had to survive the 13 year period for making final proof. The cost of the trees and the labor necessary for planting required too much of most farmers

Often, farmers and ranchers saw the law as a way to get free use of the land for 13 years. They filed a claim, but did not prove up. In the meantime, they could raise a crop or graze their cattle without investing in land or a house.

About 20 per cent of the homesteaders in all states and territories filed for a Timber Culture Act claim, or tree claim as they were commonly called. Because most of the trees died, few claimants made good on their claims. In northern Dakota Territory, 9,678 tree claims received title. The law went through a few changes to make it more reasonable. The number of acres of trees was reduced to 10. The number of surviving trees required for successful proof was also reduced. Finally, Congress repealed the law in 1882.

Why is this important? The Homestead Act did not grant farmers enough land to make a living on the Great Plains. However, farmers could add land to their Homestead Act claims through the Timber Culture Act. Then they had enough land to raise enough crops for a good income. With increased income, they could purchase more land. Some “tree-claimers” were allowed to commute their claims (pay cash for the land) after finding that the trees would not survive.

By 1900, farmers and scientists knew that trees would not create more rainfall. But farmers discovered that trees slowed the wind blowing across their farms and protected the crops. Farmers also discovered that a line of trees stopped blowing snow, causing snowdrifts that melted into their fields in the spring. Though the Timber Culture law was a failure, it offered farmers and ranchers the advantage of a little more land for a few years.

 

Wold’s Grove

In 1878, Nels H. Wold, an immigrant from Norway, filed a claim under the Timber Culture Act. He paid a $14 filing fee to the federal government when he filed the claim. (See Document 4) Under the law, he was required to plant 2,700 trees per acre on 10 acres. If, after 13 years, 675 trees per acre were still alive, Mr. Wold would receive “patent,” or title, to that quarter section. He planted the trees in the northwest quarter of section 34, in Township 147N of Range 51W. (See Map 1)

Wold File for Tree Claim
Document 4: Federal land claims involved a lot of paperwork. This paper is one of several that Nels Wold completed in order to file his claim under the Timber Culture Act. His claim was filed in 1878, so he was able to take advantage of the modifications of the law to plant a minimum of 10 acres instead of 40. He “swore” that he met all of the qualifications for a claimant under the law. SHSND Mss 20375
Wold’s Farm Traill
Map 1: This plat map shows the Wold Farm about 10 miles northwest of Hillsboro in Traill County. The farm was about three miles from the Goose River in a township named for the Wold family. SHSND Mss 20375
Wold Tree Claim Proof
Document 5:  After 13 years had passed, and Wold still had the minimum number of trees living in his claim, he returned to the land office to file for a final certificate. His original claim number is 1709; his final certificate number is 172. The numbers show that he was far more successful than others who filed a claim at the same time he did. Many of them failed to meet the final requirements. Mr. Wold had to complete a lengthy form explaining how big his trees were and how many there were. He also had to bring two neighbors to the land office to testify that he had met all the requirements. SHSND Mss 20375

Mr. Wold, who lived along the Goose River in the Red River Valley, actually planted just over 17 acres of trees. He planted according to the plan laid out by the law:

Year 1. Break [plow] 5 acres of ground

Year 2. Break 5 more acres of ground; plant grain on acres broken in Year 1.

Year 3. Plant trees on ground broken in Year 1; plant grain on acres broken in Year 2.

Year 4. Plant trees on ground broken in Year 2. (See Document 5)

Mr. Wold kept on breaking ground and planting grain followed by trees until he had more than 10 acres. He stated, in the “Testimony of the Claimant” that he “did not plant any [trees] during the 4th year for the reason that I had planted the full 10 acres required during the 3rd year. But cultivated protected and kept growing the 10 acres planted during the 3rd year.”

Wold Farmstead
Map 2: This undated, hand-drawn ledger map of the Wold farm shows how the placement of the tree claims provided shelter to the house and barns against wind and snow. The main groves are to the west of the house, but smaller groves of 1.75 to .9 acres shelter the yard on the north, south, and east sides. The original log and sod house (K) was located to the east of the trees. The machine shed (L) was built of lumber taken from the mature trees growing in the tree claim. SHSND Mss 20375

Question 10 on the Testimony form asked: “Describe the condition of the trees now growing. . . , giving their average diameter and height, . . . the kind or kinds of trees, [and] the number of trees per acre now growing. . . .” In answer to that question, Mr. Wold wrote: (See Map 2)

Mr. Wold’s house in 1891
Image 12: This photograph shows Mr. Wold’s house in 1891, the year he made final proof on his tree claim. Young trees surround the house. SHSND 20375-B375-A
 Wold Farm, 1898
Image 13: Wold Farm, 1898. The trees surrounding the house have grown more and now provide excellent protection for the house. SHSND 20375-B375-B

“Good healthy thrifty growing trees. Average diameter about 3 in. . . . right about 13 feet. (See Image 12) Mostly Box elder timber trees with a few Cottonwood ash & oak trees planted to replace a few that died. There are at least 1610 trees and more to each acre. I know these facts from personally counting the trees and measuring their height and diameter” (January 26, 1891) (See Image 13)

Mr. Wold’s son, A. N. Wold and his two sons
Image 14: This photograph shows Mr. Wold’s son, A. N. Wold and his two sons, standing next to one of the trees of the tree claim. The tree, now fifty years old, has grown to 110 feet in height. SHSND 20375-B375-F

Mr. Wold’s success rate was unusually high. (See Image 14) He had the advantage of living in the Red River Valley which has more rainfall than most of North Dakota. He received his final certificate on January 29, 1891.

Source: A.H. Wold Papers, SHSND MSS 20375